- The “Flowers” lawsuit Miley Cyrus faces challenges, as the judge weighs a copyright.
- Tempo Music Investments included that “flowers” included an unauthorized exploitation of Bruneo Mars “when I was your man.
- Judge Dean De Pressson expressed his doubts about the argument of Cyrus, saying he could undermine the music industry practices.
- The court’s decision can reconfigure the legal strategies that affect how artists deal with the ownership of the song's rights.
Miley Cyrus is currently dealing with some challenges in its battle against the laws to violate copyright related to her famous song “Flowers”.
The federal judge expresses her doubts about her request to reject the case. The lawsuit was filed against it by Tempo Music Investments, which claims that “flowers” illegally use elements from the Bruneo March path “when I was your leg.
Tempo Music, which carries partial rights to the song of Mars through co -writer Philip Lawrence, presented the lawsuit last September. They argue that “flowers” borrowed melodic, compatible and lyrical elements in 2013. In response, Cyrus tried to throw the case, stressing that Tempo did not have the attached position because they did not believe in the agreement of all the participating owners. Its legal team, led by Peter Anderson, indicated that since Tempo has only rights from one of the four authors, the claim is mainly defective.
During a recent judicial session, Judge Dean d. Pressson about doubts about the position of Cyrus, indicating that preventing the ability to prosecute it can disrupt the standards in the music industry. He asked why anyone purchased partial rights for songs if they could not impose these rights without the approval of all common dogs.
TEMPO's lawyer, Alex Winjern, supported this view, considering the argument of Cyrus “intellectual safe” and insists that the rhythm has a valid place to move forward in the lawsuit.
While Judge Preserson has not yet made a final ruling, he stated that he would issue a written decision in the coming weeks or months. If the class suggestion does not pass, the Cyrus Legal Team is ready to move forward with strong defenses.
They are planning to be convinced that the two songs have “amazing differences” and that any similarities are just basic musical elements that are not protected. The result of this issue can have significant implications for the law of copyright, especially with regard to the rights and executive capabilities of those who have partial rights in cooperative work.
Also read: Robert Pattinson shares how Zundaya's advice helped him during “Drama”.
The last update on March 12, 2025 of 247 news around the world
