When I first encountered the new Jonathan Chit Atlantic article, “Why is the mono -side Covid account”, I assumed that the answer was that the Democrats were the ones who did not calm down and are tragic for almost everything during the epidemic.
No such luck.
In the saying of Chit, the left remains open, un open, and always strives for the truth, while the ideological right remains desperately desperate from it in “pathological incompatibility”.
Even when conservatives are right, they are wrongly right.
These days, Chit claims, “They participated in the search for self-thinking-to close schools, laboratory leakage hypothesis, political effects, and other unexpected lessons. Conservatives used appropriate to engage in a round of self-extended and ridicule from LIBS.”
Now, I may believe in and I to overcome Lips who accused you of committing a mass murder to go to the church is a completely natural behavior. Nevertheless, Chait is angry with all the “sinners” and “football”.
Especially since a handful of left -wing pillars has deployed columns (late five years) recognizing the wisely that the locks were failure.
Certainly, in “a bout of confusion in the face of rapid events,” he says, he says, but Democrats only participate in a good discussion.
This is the reason, as I think, Chit wrote a piece of Kofid's era under the title “American Death Worship”, accusing Republicans of intentionally killing their citizens.
Nothing says “self -reflection”, such as accusing your political opponents of being mentally ill.
It should also be noted that very little of the “account” cut is honestly struggling with the left policy errors during Covid. The idea that a widespread reconsideration of the policy of the epidemic is a legend.
A Democrat in the Senate has not voted for former Stanford Professor Jay Bahtashara to be the director of the National Institutes of Health, despite its date of being right in Covid policy.
So, how much thinking was there already?
Then again, CHAIT cannot admit that the coverage of the media in the Covid era was perverted.
He claims that the New York Times readers “follow this discussion for years.” The problem is that conservatives are subject to the wrong impression that the “prevailing” media is “ideological solid” like their own outlets.
To confirm this claim, Chait tends strongly into a fabricated fabrication, ignoring the coverage of the coverage to focus on a large group of skeptical columns.
Anyone who was alive in 2020-2022 can tell you that the “debate” that leaks the laboratory consists of one-sided theory that the virus may be man-made, and the other accuses them of being a blind fanatic.
In October 2021, the Wuhan Institute of Viruses noted, “The target of the conspiracy theorists who promote the idea that Coronverus was made in a laboratory.”
When Senator Tom Cotton (R-Ark) presented the laboratory leakage hypothesis, Times accused him of repeating the “unexploited” conspiracy theory.
Therefore, instead of recognizing reality, Chait, along with the aspects, tries to respond to the epidemic by referring to bad predictions by President Donald Trump and Elon Musk.
Hey, there is no doubt that the Republicans said a lot of crazy things.
But imagine treatments or unjustified optimistic about the end of the epidemic are not what they are close to horse, immoral, or authoritarian such as closed churches, custody of stadiums, destroy business, opposition monitoring, or forced thousands of Americans to miss the funerals of their loved ones or undermine the future of millions of schools.
It is impressive to admit mistakes, but not if it admits less estimate to hide real stones.
On the last day, for example, Catherine Maher, CEO of NPR, was witnessing in front of Congress and acknowledged that her network, which is still, for unknown reasons, was still funded by taxpayers, was “wrong” and “should have been covered Hunter Baiden [laptop] A more aggressive story. “
The problem was not that NPR covered the story of Hunter Baiden or Wuhan Institute with insufficient.
She joined every other journalist in the “main” media, and most technology companies, to suppress them.
This is similar to acknowledging when you have committed an armed robbery.
Sheet ends his review with perhaps more confirmation. He says that the liberal of America has “sensitivity to belief and openness to the mind”, which “is the essence of belief. (Read John Stewart Mail.)”
I have read a mill, and I do not discover a lot of “liberalism” on most of the contemporary left.
Fear, statistics and enthusiasm of the Antichrist adopted by progressive people have nothing to do with classical liberalism.
In fact, the wise and hysteria that almost all the issue apply to these days are great reasons that the Democrats are in a weaker position than they have been several decades ago.
The Covid system was a tragic appearance of this non -liberal mentality, a series of devastating mistakes that have not yet endured the left.
David Harsani is a great writer in Washington's examiner.
