Advocacy Group Criticizes US Plan to Allocate Broadband Funds to Musk

Advocacy Group Criticizes US Plan to Allocate Broadband Funds to Musk

Home


  • The Da`wah Group criticizes us a plan to allocate the wide range of domain boxes for musk, critics argue that optical fiber networks are faster and more reliable than satellites.
  • FREE PREE PREE claims does not need Starlink to support the profitable taxpayer.
  • Fears raised about the conflict of interests involved in the management of musk and the Trump administration.

Free Press, an online invitation group, has expressed serious concerns about reports indicating that the United States government has directed a large part of the 42.5 billion rural broader broadcast initiative towards Elon Musk.

Originally, the program is designed to expand the wide range of wide access to the wide range of fiber networks, which are famous for its speed and long -term sustainability.

However, under the leadership of the Minister of Commerce Howard Lottenic, there are indications that satellite -based service providers such as Starlink can be given priority instead. Critics argue that such a shift can undermine the original goals of the program and prefers MUSK commercial interests over more permanent solutions.

The invitation group criticizes a plan to allocate the wide range of domains for musk Source: AzerNews

Krij Aaron, President of Free Press, was especially audio in his criticism. The Trump administration was accused of calming efforts from the two parties from the two parties to provide internet at reasonable and reliable prices for rural societies, claiming that these changes benefit the musk in an impartial way.

Aaron stressed that optical fiber networks do not provide only faster and reliable service than satellite -based options, but also conforms to a closer way with the intention of the program to bridge the digital gap. It also raised concerns about the conflict of potential interests, pointing to the double Musk roles as a government consultant and an important donor of Donald Trump's 2024 campaign.

This discussion comes in the aftermath of the previous decisions taken by the Federal Communications Committee (FCC) during the Biden administration, which rejected Starlink requests to obtain federal subsidies. The Federal Communications Committee (FCC) cited concerns about Starlink's ability to meet the standards of speed and the ability to bear costs, ultimately rejected nearly $ 900 million of funding.

The agency argued that Starlink was expensive and did not meet the needs of the disadvantaged areas. Despite these setbacks, reports indicate that the Trump administration is now tending to prefer musk projects in various sectors, including defense contracts and broadband financing.

Free Press also questioned the necessity of directing taxpayer dollars towards Starlink, on the pretext that the company is already profitable without general subsidies. The group expressed its frustration with what it considers to consider the poor allocation of resources aimed at closing the digital gap of millions of Americans who still lack the Internet.

For them, this possible transformation of politics is not only a lost opportunity, but also a betrayal of the original task of the program to provide fairly fair infrastructure in the country.

Also read: Adrian Broody criticized the long Oscar speech after gums

Last update on March 5, 2025 of 247 news around the world





Source

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *