Harvard University, who revealed that the university's accepted law magazine was employed based on race, has taken revenge on the provocation of a federal investigation, according to a report.
Daniel Vaserman was slapped with a “official reprimand” in the file of his law reviewing – and asked him to destroy the Harvard law review documents that he participated with the media.
It made the law run by students.[r]An equation that any parties with which you participated with secret materials … delete or return them to it Review“An email in May that was obtained by the exit countries.
Two days later, Vaserman was informed that he was getting an official reprimand – despite the protection of federal law of violators.
“This official reprimand tells you that your actions are violated Law review The disciplinary committee of the magazine wrote on May 22: “Policies and do not reflect the expectations of our society.”
“Continuous violations may lead to additional disciplinary measures.”
The reprimand was retracted after five days after the intervention of the Ministry of Justice and accused the law reviewing to intimidate witnesses.
The law reviewed that she did not know that Wasserman was working with the government – although the May 12 message from the government was called, and then working as an editor, as a “cooperative witness” in its achievement.
Then the magazine claimed that it had issued instructions only that Wasserman was destroying copies of the files that they claimed have published, not the original copies on school servers, and the mail state.
Vaserman has downloaded thousands of documents and exchanged it with a free lighthouse, which was claimed to have revealed how to distinguish the esteemed law against white men, and instead gives the racing class priorities on academic merit, when it comes to appointing editors and publishing articles.
In the 2024 Memorandum, which was reviewed by The Free Beacon, the Law Review editors seemed to be the author of “Colorful Woman” when it comes to looking at her story of publication, saying that this was calculated to meet our “priorities”.
The Trump administration has launched an investigation into the cases in April, but it was not mentioned in the Ivy League magazine, which will take a job in the White House soon.
The New York Times reported that Vaserman is now working during the era of Stephen Miller, who was leading the collective deportation efforts of the administration, the New York Times reported.
The White House told The Times Wasserman the job on April 25 – on the same day that the initial story of Free Beacon about the alleged discrimination of the law review. His first day was on May 22.
Upon arrival on Saturday, Vasermann referred requests to comment on the White House, which did not respond immediately.
A White House spokesman formerly refused to share the details of the Wasserman employment, but praised his courage in a statement to the Times.
“Harvard University violates the federal law by distinguishing it, and the student was brave enough to summon them in this matter,” the statement said. “Because of his actions, the Ministry of Justice is investigating clear violations of the law.”
She also did not respond to the law review to request the comment, but last week the magazine's head published a fact that its leaders “categorically deny” allegations of race-based discrimination-and coffee that news reports “Dynon” magazine's procedures.
Harvard University had previously confirmed this position that the magazine was independent of the ivy, but the school “is committed to ensuring that the programs and activities that it supervises are compatible with all the laws in force and investigate any alleged credibility violations.”
