Britain risks being ‘island of strangers’ without immigration crackdown – as Keir admits system is too easy ‘to abuse’

Britain risks being ‘island of strangers’ without immigration crackdown – as Keir admits system is too easy ‘to abuse’

Tech


Written by Harry Cole, the political editor

The Minister of the Interior spent last weekend to write a fiery front to help the 80 -page migration land today.

The migrations of legal immigration in the university sectors and care sectors are in their eyes, and they call for time to “my children who do not like the foreign chicken block” for criminals and illegal immigrants to avoid deportation thanks to the ridiculous European Human Rights Convention.

All good things, if the Labor Party can obtain it through the kitchen and lactating shell on their back areas.

But it seems that there is another objection to the reform of immigration in YVette Cooper: Chancellor Rachel Reeves and two decades of This Group Thing.

Certainly, she had something to come down from her chest on the eve of the publication, as she aims directly to the belief of the fictional story that more foreigners are the magic contraceptive pills for economic problems in Britain;

“If this approach was correct, we would have seen, when we saw that the level of net deportation, this high level of employment abroad, certainly we had seen increasing growth alongside that and did not do.”

“In fact, what we have seen is the economy that has been confirmed because, through failure to invest in UK workers who undermine productivity as well, it undermines the ability to return people to work who are not currently working, so besides these standard high heights of employment abroad, we have this significant increase in people who do not work here in the UK. These things are linked.”

By JOVE, I think it gets it.

Finally, someone in this government is ready to shoot some sacred cows of the progressive mind.

Nobody leaves the Ministry of Interior more than the left than they entered, so the Minister of Interior of the Conservative Party, Robert Jenrik, was represented in front of her; Cooper seems to have been on a trip in the past ten months.

It may last for a long time, but the swallow of one does not make a summer, and there are many battles for the next interior minister.

I hear that there were already large kicks from the cabinet in the white immigration sheet today, which will now go within months of consultation and Japper before it was legislated.

The good opening of Cooper remains, but one of them has already tried to strangle at birth by the treasury is still addicted to the sugar rush from cheap imported workers while fighting to breathe life in the expectations of blood growth already for the coming years.

The Treasury Department also has other growth plans, which is to better cancel the British Union's exit planning for access to European markets.

Yesterday, The Home SEC was talking in terms of tens of thousands about what these new plans could do to reduce legal immigration next year or so … just as the government recently recognized – after months of lying – that it would provide similar numbers to the European Union.

In an attempt to cancel the prime minister and the advisor to reset Brexit and a new defensive and security agreement with the bloc, freedom of movement returned to the table.

Since the European Union's request was revealed to obtain a plan to move young people for less than the 1940s last August, the government insisted that they “have no plans” to interact with such a proposal.

The return of the free movement to less than the 1940s is the essential GIST, allowing the younger Europeans to flow again to the UK to study and work.

Over and over again, the ministers and singers insisted on the record that there were no plans for such a plan, but all the time they were building negotiations with Brussels about its acceptance.

Now they tell us that “the plan to move the smart youth subject to control will, of course, will have benefits for our youth.”

The plan all the time.

If we leave aside the rampant breach of trust, what will this do for legal immigration numbers?

What is the goal of getting rid of one hand, only to rid tens of thousands of other visas with the other?

People with NO10 insist that such a plan will be tightly covered, but we all know that the British state is largely useless in following these things.

Remember when we were told that there were only three million citizens from the European Union in the United Kingdom during the exit of Britain from the European Union, only for more than six million to apply to stay after the vacation vote.

The increasing national statistics office does not really have the number of foreigners here, as they increased their predictions significantly in the past year after finding 166,000 additional immigrants below the sofa.

Or what about the news that the asylum hotel bill was not actually 4.5 billion pounds, but it was about 10 billion pounds?

The British state is foolish in calculating these things, so be very careful of promises of strict supervision, control, eyes and watchful covers.

YVette Coper may be on the right path, but its biggest battles are still coming.

If we simply go to Brussels and allow tens of thousands of Europeans to return to the country, this must come at a price of more strict restrictions on the visas elsewhere.

Anything less than that makes today's “Clampdown” migration.

Someone tells the cabinet better …



Source

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *