- Federal judge refuses to prevent Elon Musk immediately from accessing government data or shooting at fire workers.
- The decision came in a lawsuit submitted by 14 democratic countries that challenge the authority of Dog to reach the sensitive government data.
- Chutkan realizes the state's fears of the countries, which include New Mexico and Arizona.
The American judge rejected an applicant to prevent Elon Musk temporarily and the Ministry of Government efficiency (DOGE) against the refusal of federal employees and access to the agency's data, which represents a victory for President Donald Trump to push him to reduce the government workforce.
American boycott judge, Tania Chutcan, admitted that there are valid questions about the Musk Authority, but stated that there is no evidence of serious legal damage that would include a temporary restriction order.
Fourteen states, led by the Democrats, filed a lawsuit challenging the legal authority for musk, but Judge Qutcan refused the emergency request to stop his actions.
The states claimed that Musk, which was classified by the White House, is classified as a private government employee, possessing an unoccupied authority and that it violates the total appointment of the constitution.
The Prosecutor argued that musk practiced authority that the constitutional reserves of those who were elected or confirmed by the Senate.
The Trump administration has argued that any layoff was launched by the agency's heads and claimed that despite Musa's general support for the initiative, it does not manage daily Doug operations.
The Ministry of Justice claimed that the states have not showed any imminent damage that could justify the court's involvement.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?
The lawyers of the Ministry of Justice in a court café stated that the states' assertion that musk has the authority to make government decisions “incorrect” and “only depends on the profitable impact with the authority.”
Cotccan admitted the concerns raised by the group of countries, which includes New Mexico and Arizona. In its ruling, she indicated that “the court realizes that the unpredictable Dougi actions led to uncertainty and the great confusion of the prosecutors and many of their agencies and their residents.”
However, at this point, it remains unintentionally how Dogs will affect countries, and judges can issue orders only to prevent specific and immediate damage.
Also read: Rumors of Cardi B and Stefon Diggs Romantic
The last update on February 19, 2025 of 247 news around the world
