Prince Harry was in the United Kingdom on Tuesday to attend a hearing in the Royal Justice Court
Prince Harry did not see his father on Tuesday – although King Charles was miles away.
The Duke of Sussex and King Charles did not see each other personally for 14 months, and it is believed that it is. Harry, though, arrived in London Heathrow while Charles, 76, was in the capital of cancer reschedule before an official trip to Italy. His 40 -year -old son was in London to attend a hearing at Royal Courts of Justice, as he defied the decision to remove his security in the United Kingdom.
It was previously reported that the king was “frustrated” in the long legitimate battle of Harry and worries his son who wants to pressure him in “the wrong belief that the king has control of his security.”
When entering the central London court on Tuesday morning, Harry waved on Tuesday morning, but he did not speak to the correspondents who gathered abroad. He was wearing a dark suit with a decorative blue tie and walking across the bell square, and he did not respond as he asked a reporter, “Did you talk to your father?”
Read more: Meghan Markle PodCast Bombshells – a secret health battle, costume, as it was always fearful
Since I traveled to Rome, Charles and Camella, Queen Qonsort, was marveled at the historic city of Colosseum, and met the children of enthusiastic schools in the iconic teacher. Earlier, they are The ceremonial welcome included a joint offer by red stocks and Italian counterparts.
They also followed 44 steps to put a wreath in the grave of the unknown soldier. The spouses were received with a chanting of the colossal and hosted a reception. They celebrate the twentieth anniversary of their marriage in the city on Wednesday with a series of additional posts.
But Harry, at the same time, sat in the crowded courtroom, sometimes notes with the start of procedures. The Court of Appeal heard that the Duke “was distinguished from various and unjustified and minimal treatment,” but the Ministry of Interior, which bears legal responsibility for the committee’s decisions, opposes the appeal. Her lawyers previously told the Supreme Court decisions taken on the basis of “the case of each case.”
The Royal Executive Committee and VIP (RAVEC) previously decided that Harry obtain a different degree of protection funded by the taxpayer when it is in the UK. Retired Supreme Court judge, Sir Peter Lyn, ruled the decision of Rafak last year, which was taken in early 2020 after the Duke and Duchess of Sussez resigned from Royal Royals High workers.
However, speaking on Tuesday, the martyr of Fatima KC said in favor of the Duke: “When Raven made his decision in February 2020 regarding the security security of the appellant, he did not apply his reference conditions to this decision -making process.” The session is scheduled to conclude the session in front of Sir Jeffrey Foss, the Lord controversy between, and the Roses Justice Edis on Wednesday with a decision expected to be written at a later time.